Tacitova sentencioznost / Tacitus’ Sententiousness

Sentencija – retorski ukras u Tacitovim Analima / Sententia - a rhetorical ornament in Tacitus’ Annals

Authors

  • Sanja Ljubišić University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Philosophy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54524/2490-3930.2023.109

Keywords:

Tacitus, sentence, Annals, “new style”, enthymeme, chria, epiphoneme, language and style

Abstract

This work focuses on sententia, a rhetorical element which Tacitus skillfully incorporated into Annals. The introduction provides a brief history of sententia and its definition in ancient and rhetorical theory. As Tacitus belonged to a specific literary style (Seneca’s “new style”), his way of writing was characterized by short and antithetical sentences, stylistic and rhetorical embellishments, unusual word choices, and a predilection for proverbial or sententious observations. Such sententious expression, as a hallmark of the sublime style, reinforced the impression of truth in Annals. In a pessimistic tone, the historian speaks about human greatness as well as weaknesses, and their role throughout history. To better understand Tacitus’ sententiousness, the second chapter discusses the general aspects and specificities of sententiae in Annals. The general aspects include themes and social issues, i.e. social deviations that the historian dealt with in his sententiae. As sententiae were used to reveal deeper truths, their use has been called “rhetoric of disclosure” by some, while others, due to their connection to historical context, call it “sociological rhetoric”. The specificities of Tacitus’ sententiae relate to their form, grammatical-syntactical, and stylistic properties. The third chapter deals with the structuring technique of sententiae in Annals, which in Tacitus’ case, is related to historical context. Their function was to portray various historical personalities, as well as for the historian to express his own view of history. Wth that in mind, they were classified as sententiae in the speeches of historical personalities or sententiae used in direct narration. In addition to classification, a linguistic-stylistic analysis was carried out, revealing many stylistic and rhetorical figures, as well as poetic expressions. Based on the analysis of selected material, certain conclusions about sententiae were drawn. In addition to their moral and ethical content, we noticed the general, as well as specific aspects of sententiae, their structuring technique, function, and classification, as well as their epigrammatic and poetic stylization in Tacitus’ Annals.

References

Beker 1997 – M. Beker, Kratka povijest antičke retorike, Putokazi, 1997.

Будимир, Флашар (1986) – М. Будимир, M. Флашар, Преглед римске књижевности, Научна књига, 1986.

Conte 1994 – B. G. Conte, Latin Literature, The Johns Hopkins University Press,1994.

Divković 1988 – M. Divković, Latinsko-hrvatski rječnik, Hrvatsko-slavonsko-dalmatinska zemaljska vlada, 1900, reprint 1988.

Horna K. 1935 – K. Horna, “Gnome, Gnomendichtung, Gnomologien”, in RE Suppl. 6: 74‒89.

Ђурић 1996 – М. Н. Ђурић, Историја хеленске књижевности, Завод за уџбенике и наставна средства, 1996.

Јелић 1997 – В. Јелић, Προγυμνάσματα ретора Афтонија, припремне вежбе за беседнике, превод, предговор и напомене Војислав Јелић, Матица српска, САНУ, 1997.

Keitel 2006 – E. Keitel, “Sententia and Structure in Tacitus Histories 1.12‒49”, Arethusa Vol. 39, Number 2, 2006, 219‒244. Published by Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2006.0014.

Kirchner 2001 – R. Kirchner, Sentenzen im Werk des Tacitus. Palingenesia, Bd. 74. Steiner, 2001.

Ljubišić 2019 – S. Ljubišić, Tacitovi Anali u srpskim i hrvatskim prevodima 20. vijeka. Univerzitet u Banjoj Luci, Filozofski fakultet, 2019.

Ljubišić 2023 – S. Ljubišić, “Književno-istorijska veza između Salustija i Tacita”, 70 godina Odsjeka za romanistiku, Zbornik radova, Filozofski fakultet, 2023, 450‒460.

Mellor 1993 – R. Mellor, Tacitus, Routledge, 1993.

O’Gorman 1996 – E. O’Gorman, “Sentetious Tacitus – Sinclair, P. (1995), Tacitus the Sententious Historian. A Sociology of Rhetoric in Annales 1–6. Pp. ix+262. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press”. The Classical Review 46, Issue 2. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2009, 251‒252.

Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, in RE: Γνώμη, Band VII, 2 (1912), 1481‒1499.

Perić 1991 – S. Perić, “Sentencije u Senekinim tragedijama Medeja i Tijest”, Latina et Graeca 38, 1991, 13‒24.

Šašel Kos 1990 – M. Šašel Kos, “Sententiae in the Agricola of Tacitus”, Živa antika 40, 1990, 83‒109.

Škiljan 1989 – D. Škiljan, “Terminologija: figure i tropi”, Latina et Graeca 34, 1989, 62‒75.

Zima 1988 – L. Zima, Figure u našem narodnom pjesništvu: s njihovom teorijom, Globus, 1988.

Waszink, Jan (2010), “Your Tacitism or mine? Modern and early-modern conceptions of Tacitus and Tacitism”, History of European Ideas 36, 375–385. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.06.003 ili History of European Ideas | Taylor &

Francis Online (tandfonline.com) preuzeto 10. 12. 2022.

Downloads

Published

28.12.2023

How to Cite

Ljubišić, S. (2023). Tacitova sentencioznost / Tacitus’ Sententiousness: Sentencija – retorski ukras u Tacitovim Analima / Sententia - a rhetorical ornament in Tacitus’ Annals. Journal of BATHINVS Association ACTA ILLYRICA / Godišnjak Udruženja BATHINVS ACTA ILLYRICA Online ISSN 2744-1318, (7), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.54524/2490-3930.2023.109

Issue

Section

Articles